Keep the Government Out of Our Bedrooms and Ensure Equal Rights for All

February 25, 2011

My 28-year-old daughter is an attorney.  She said to me, “Dad, it is hard for people of my generation to believe that, as recently as when you were in college, it was illegal, in some states, for people to marry based solely on their race.”  She then said, “I bet when I am your age […]

Read the full article →

Clarence Thomas – A Disservice to Us All

February 24, 2011

A United States Supreme Court Justice does a disservice to all of us by not being engaged.  Justices must participate in oral argument to fully understand the issues, to afford the advocates an opportunity to advocate, and to educate the public about the judicial system.  In addition to submitting briefs, the parties engage in oral […]

Read the full article →

Ask Warnken: Juvenile Jurisdiction v. Adult Criminal Jurisdiction

January 12, 2011

At common law, in England, people were considered adults, and were held accountable for their criminal acts, at age 14.  If the person was less than age 14, but was over age 7, that person could be held accountable, as an adult, on a case-by-case basis.  At common law, there was no criminal culpability for […]

Read the full article →

Social Networking Sites and Criminal Litigation

January 3, 2011

Chances are that, if you are on-line and reading this blog, you just signed off your Facebook account, MySpace account, or Twitter account.  Social networking websites grow as people seek to share pictures, opinions, views, celebrity sightings, etc.  Now that many of us have voluntarily shared our private lives with our 1,500 closest friends, the […]

Read the full article →

Health Care Statute is Unconstitutional

December 27, 2010

Federal Judge Rules That Obama Administration’s Health Care Statute Is Unconstitutional Federal Judge Henry Hudson, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, ruled that the President Obama’s federal health care statute is unconstitutional, in part, to the extent that it imposes the “minimum essential health coverage provision,” which requires every […]

Read the full article →

Miranda in Maryland – Part II

November 16, 2010

Continued from Part I – Here. III.       Compliance with Miranda A.        What constitutes a proper Warning? Another recent Maryland case addresses whether police have complied with Miranda.  In State v. Luckett,[i] the Court of Appeals analyzed whether a police officer’s recitation of Miranda properly informed the Defendant of his privilege against self-incrimination.  Although the Supreme […]

Read the full article →

Miranda in Maryland – Part I

November 10, 2010

A Criminal Procedure Update: Miranda in Maryland I.          Introduction In 1966, the Supreme Court decided Miranda v. Arizona,[i] which implemented a procedure to ensure that police complied with the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination.[ii] Following the Miranda decision, a debate ensued over whether Miranda was truly of constitutional dimension, or whether it was simply a […]

Read the full article →

Key SCOTUS Cases – Article II – US v Nixon

October 25, 2010

Art. II. (Executive Branch), § 2, Cl. 1 (President):  United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). Grand jury named President Nixon as un-indicted co-conspirator.  Special prosecutor subpoenaed audiotapes and documents of conversations between President and staff, which President moved to quash, citing executive privilege.  Supreme Court held that (1) it had jurisdiction; (2) issue […]

Read the full article →

Key SCOTUS Cases – Article I

September 21, 2010

Art. I. (Legislative Branch), § 8 (Enumerated Powers), Cl. 18 (Necessary & Proper Clause):  McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819). Congress created a national bank.  Md. taxed bank notes not chartered in Md., which harmed the national bank as the only out-of-state bank.  When the national bank refused to pay the tax, Md. filed […]

Read the full article →

Key SCOTUS Cases – C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown

September 16, 2010

C & A Carbone, Inc., v. Town of Clarkstown Legislative Branch; Enumerated Powers; Dormant Commerce Clause Town built a waste recycling center and enacted an ordinance requiring all solid waste generated in the town to pass through its center.  Company processed solid waste, did not use Town’s facility, and was cited for violating the ordinance.  […]

Read the full article →

← Previous Entries

Next Entries →